Fingertip Injuries in Mask Factory Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a dramatic increase in the demand of face masks. The aim of this study is to look into the demographics, clinical details, clinical outcome and the risk factors for fingertip injuries in mask manufacturing factory workers. Methods: This is a retrospective review of all patients admitted to a regional hospital following a fingertip injury sustained at a mask making factory over a 6-month period from March 2020 to August 2020. Data with regard to gender, age, hand dominance, job position, injured finger, type of injury, mechanism of injury, treatment, clinical outcome (time to return to work), as well as risk factors for injuries (training before work, duration of work before injury, previous experience on working on similar machines, protective measures and working hours) were collected and analysed. Results: There were seven patients in total (M:F = 6:1) with a mean age of 38.4 years. Four patients had injuries on their dominant hands. The most commonly injured finger was the middle finger (n = 3). The most common injury pattern was fingertip amputation (n = 5). Five patients required operative management. Only four patients received training before work and six patients were injured within the first month of work. No patient had previous experience in operating similar machines. Long working hours is also a related risk factor. Conclusions: Better occupational safety and training should be employed to prevent these injuries. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

Comparing digital replantation versus revision amputation patient reported outcomes for traumatic digital amputations of the hand: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Adults with traumatic digital amputation (TDA) of the hand may be managed with replantation or revision amputation. To date, there is no systematic review evaluating patient reported outcomes (PROs) comparing replantation versus revision amputation. METHODS: Three databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed) were systematically searched in duplicate from inception until June 13, 2019 using Covidence software. Studies comparing replantation versus revision amputation outcomes were considered for inclusion. Methodological quality was assessed using Methodologic Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. Data were pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis model using Revman software. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). RESULTS: Of 4350 studies identified, 12 retrospective cohort studies met inclusion criteria and compared TDA outcomes for replantation (n = 717; 82.9% male; mean age 40.3) versus revision amputation (n = 1046; 79.8% male; mean age 41.7). The overall replantation survival rate was 85.3%. The average MINORS score was 57% (13.75/24). Replantation of the thumb had a superior Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ) score (+11.88, 95% CI [7.78-15.99], I2 = 21%) compared with revision amputation. Replantation of single non-thumb digits had a superior MHQ score (+5.31, 95% CI [3.10-7.51], I2 = 67%) and Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score (-5.16, 95% CI [-8.27 to -2.06], I2 = 0%) compared with revision amputation. Most patients in the meta-analysis were from Asian populations (87.9%). CONCLUSION: There is low-quality evidence that thumb replantation achieves superior PROs compared with revision amputation, which may be clinically important. Replantation of single non-thumb digits also yielded superior PROs, which is likely not clinically important and based on very low-quality evidence. Future studies with populations outside Asia are required to determine if PROs vary based on cultural differences toward digital amputation.

Emergency Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery in the COVID-19-Positive Patient.

The case spectrum in hand surgery is one of extremes-purely elective day surgery cases under local anesthesia to mangling limb injuries that require immediate, and frequently, lengthy, surgery. Despite the cancellation of most elective orthopedic and plastic surgical procedures, hand surgeons around the world continue to see a steady stream of limb-threatening cases such as severe trauma and infections that require emergent surgical care. With the increase in community-spread, an increasing number of COVID-19-infected patients may be asymptomatic or have mild, nonspecific or atypical symptoms. Some of them may already have an ongoing, severe infection. The time-sensitive nature of some of these cases means that hand surgeons may need to operate urgently on patients who may be suspected of COVID-19 infections, often before confirmatory test results are available. General guidelines for perioperative care of the COVID-19-positive patient have been published. However, our practices differ from those of general orthopedic and plastic surgery, primarily because of the focus on trauma. This article discusses the perioperative and technical considerations that are essential to manage the COVID-19 patient requiring emergency care, without compromising clinical outcomes and while ensuring the safety of the attending staff.